Strategic air medical evacuation of critically ill patients involving an intensive care physician: A retrospective analysis of 16 years of mission data.

BACKGROUND: Strategic medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) allows airborne repatriation of soldiers injured or sick on missions to their national territory. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of strategic MEDEVAC performed by intensive care physicians (ICP) and to analyze the role of the ICP in the management of critical care situations in flight. METHODS: All soldiers who had high or medium dependency conditions and who benefited from a strategic MEDEVAC with an ICP on board between 1 January 2001 and 30 November 2017 were included in this epidemiological retrospective study. RESULTS: A total of 452 soldiers were repatriated; the causes of repatriation were either trauma (n = 245; 54%) or medical pathologies (n = 207; 46%). Two hundred and seventy-six (61%) evacuations were performed within 48 h. The median annual number of strategic MEDEVAC with an ICP was 26 [20-32]. One hundred and fifty-five (34%) patients were mechanically ventilated and 103 (23%) received catecholamines. The median SAPS II score was 13 [8-24]. One hundred and seventy-eight adverse events were identified, of which 123 (69%) related to a worsening of the patient's clinical condition and 30 (20%) related to a technical problem. Forty-seven (20%) patients who initially appeared stable worsened during the flight. No deaths occurred on board, however, and no flights had to be diverted due to an uncontrolled care situation. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the presence of an ICP ensured a continued high-level care for patients with serious trauma and medical injuries, due to the medical and aeronautical expertise that resulted from the theoretical and practical training of the personnel on board. Based on these results, lessons regarding future MEDEVAC flights could be learned in order to continue to improve patient outcome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome in the forward environment. Retrospective analysis of acute respiratory distress syndrome cases among French Army war casualties.

BACKGROUND: According to the Joint Theater Trauma Registry, 26% to 33% of war casualties develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with high mortality. Here, we aimed to describe ARDS incidence and severity among patients evacuated from war zones and admitted to French intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective multicentric review of all patients evacuated from war zones and admitted to French ICUs between 2003 and 2018. Our analysis included all medical and trauma patients developing ARDS according to the Berlin definition. We evaluated ARDS incidence, and determined ARDS severity from arterial blood gas analysis. Analyzed parameters included invasive ventilation duration, ARDS treatments, ICU stay length, and 30-day and 90-day mortalities. RESULTS: Among 141 included patients (84% military; median age, 30 years), 57 (42%) developed ARDS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was mild in 13 (22%) patients, moderate in 24 (42%) patients, and severe in 20 (36%) patients. Evacuation occurred in less than 26 hours for 32 war casualties, 17 non-war-related trauma patients, and 8 medical patients. Among severe trauma patients, median Injury Severity Score was 34, and Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax was 3. Upon French ICU admission, median partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/inspirated fraction of oxygen ratio was 241 [144-296]. Administered ARDS treatments included intubation (98%, n = 56), protective ventilation (87%, n = 49), neuromuscular blockade (76%, n = 43), prone position (16%, n = 9), inhaled nitric oxide (10%, n = 6), almitrine (7%, n = 7), and extracorporeal life support (4%, n = 2). Median duration of invasive ventilation was 13 days, ICU stay was 18 days, 30-day mortality was 14%, and 90-day mortality was 21%. CONCLUSION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome was frequent and severe among French patients evacuated from war theaters. Improved treatment capacities are needed in the forward environment-for example, a specialized US team can provide extracorporeal life support for highly hypoxemic war casualties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III.

Critical Care Skill Triad for Tactical Evacuations.

OBJECTIVE: Providing medical support to French soldiers deployed on war theater everywhere around the world is the first mission of the French Military Medical Service (FMMS). En-route critical care is critical to maintain the continuum of care and safety during forward and tactical medical evacuation (MEDEVAC). The FMMS has developed specific training programs to ensure optimal en-route critical care air transport. These courses need to be continuously adjusted to the returns of experience and to the operational changes. The aim of our survey was to characterize the critical care skills required for tactical MEDEVAC on fixed wing aircraft. METHODS: A 10-items survey was sent to 22 flight surgeons previously deployed in the Sahel-Saharan Strip. Eight questions focused on basic critical care skills. The 2 last items assessed the flight surgeons' willingness to follow a pre deployment course in a critical care unit and in a transfusion center. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 22 flight surgeons responded to the survey. All but one responder had to deal with at least one critical care skill. The most frequent critical care skills required were the management of mechanical ventilation, catecholamine infusion and blood product transfusion. Five of the 14 responders reported on-board blood product transfusion, including red blood cells, lyophilized plasma and fresh whole blood. CONCLUSION: Our survey highlights the need for the MEDEVAC teams to be skilled in critical care medicine. We defined a triad of critical care skills required for the management of severe casualties, including the management of mechanical ventilation, catecholamine infusion and blood product transfusion.

Ten Years of En Route Critical Care Training.

OBJECTIVE: The French Military Health Service (FMHS) has developed a training program for medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) of critical care patients on fixed wing aircraft. METHODS: We conducted a 10-year retrospective analysis (2006-2015) of the data from the FMHS Academy. The number of trainees was listed according to the different courses and medical specialties. The number of MEDEVACs recorded during the period was described. RESULTS: Since 2006, the FMHS has developed training courses designed for MEDEVAC of critical care patients. Forty-five collective strategic MEDEVAC courses were delivered to 91 intensivists, 130 anesthetic nurses, 79 flight surgeons, 55 flight nurses, and 89 nurses. Five sessions of tactical MEDEVAC courses were performed for 14 flight surgeons, 6 flight nurses, and 17 other nurses. Ten sessions of individual strategic MEDEVAC courses were delivered to 17 intensivists, 10 flight surgeons, 21 flight nurses, and 7 other nurses. Between 2006 and 2015, 818 (± 68) individual strategic MEDEVACs were performed per year. Thirty-three (± 19) concerned critical care patients. Five missions of collective strategic MEDEVAC were performed for 56 patients. CONCLUSION: The FMHS has developed specific courses for the MEDEVAC of critical care patients, allowing the training of numerous MEDEVAC teams.

Disposition of children with burns in emergency departments in Île de France.

The majority of burn injuries are managed by emergency departments (EDs), which are the pivotal axis in patient assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the discharge destination of children with burn injuries presenting to EDs in Île de France. Therefore, a postal questionnaire was sent to 91 EDs. The number of children with burns and their discharge status after passing through the ED in 2005, as well as the clinical positions of practitioners involved, the discharge destination of children, and the conditions resulting in a transfer to a burn center were assessed. Forty-six EDs replied to the questionnaire. Pediatric burns corresponded to 0.63% of pediatric visits in EDs. The rates of admission (7.8%) and transfer (1.9%) were low. Larger EDs had a higher admission rate and a lower rate of transfer. The need for advice from a burn center remained constant as well as the transfer rate to a burn center (both around 14%), irrespective of the size of the ED. Reasons for transfer agreed with data in the literature. More than 3200 children were registered with burns in half of the region's EDs during 2005. The majority of burns were not severe, as demonstrated by the low number of admissions and transfers, and most children were cared for locally in nonspecialized settings. Nevertheless, the relationship between burn centers and all EDs, not just the large one, needs to be strengthened to improve the quality of care given to these children.

Clinical and therapeutic aspects of childhood kerosene poisoning in Djibouti.

We report a prospective and descriptive study about childhood acute poisoning with kerosene in Djibouti. Acute poisoning is a common and stable occurrence in low socioeconomic groups in Africa, where negligence is the main cause of poisoning. The respiratory system was the main target, with 41% of patients having pneumonia, which may become life-threatening, but with low mortality rate. Asymptomatic patients (35%) can be discharged, while those with pulmonary or neurological signs must be admitted for observation and supportive treatment based on oxygen administration. Our study suggests management and provides a discussion for therapeutic options and emphasizes the importance of prevention.